Guest Blogger: Steven Waddy
Steven Waddy is a real estate agent and lawyer in Baltimore, MD. A student of civil rights, Steven works with communities to promote economic wealth, through ownership and education.
Second, as seen in the recent study released in North Carolina, charters are a method of re-segregating urban school districts and redirecting the discussion of wealth redistribution and the racial wealth gap by making urban public schools compete with urban charter schools. The schools that are dealing with the highest rate of poverty and racial isolation are given paltry resources and limited time frames to address the twin burdens of racial and economic bias. By under-funding them and ignoring the neighborhoods where they reside, developers and city planners have sought to decrease the value of the property in those neighborhoods, many of which are already crime ridden and therefore heavily policed. Which is ironic since the police are generally given the better technology, better pay, better benefits, better work hours, better staffing options, and better work conditions than the teachers and administrators who are doing the real work of educator, social worker, mediator, parent, and psychologist. The developers and urban politicians are not carrying out this same strategy in their own neighborhoods and towns. There are no massive charter school operations sprouting up in wealthy suburbs seeking to privatize the operations of the school district. You don't see this in the suburbs of Philadelphia, the suburbs of Detroit, the suburbs of Washington D.C. You only see it where the wealthy have decided that they will no longer invest and they only do it as a means to redirect the conversation away from their wealth hoarding and their belief that the lower middle class and lower class families in the urban centers deserve their lot in life.
I hate that it has come to this. I hate that black people are pitted against each other because they see the benefits of going to a certain charter school as opposed to a neighborhood public school. I have friends who are KIPP graduates or are starting their own charter schools with the hopes of helping to nurture the Black students who they deem "most worthy". They always couch their support for charters as a benevolent mission for the kids who are doing what they're "supposed to do" and shouldn't have to suffer as a result of knucklehead behaviors, at the lower achieving schools. It appears that with the push to develop and promote charter schools, our local governments are comfortable with the idea of selling our children to the highest bidder, and therefore removing the community from the school. Children are seen as stock options, and once the school is unable to perform, the stock is sold, and the school closes, leaving the fledgling neighborhood school with the task of picking up the pieces, yet again. It's sad, but this is where we are.

Comments
Post a Comment